Please understand that when I mention CNME grads\' use of prescription drugs and surgical procedures I am not intending that to be a negative point. I mention those characteristics only as a point of distinction between the grads of CNME accredited schools and those of ANMA accredited schools (neither of which, BTW, are recognized\" accrediting agencies of the federal govt.).

Certainly, there are other differences between these two naturopathic camps. However, the inclusion of prescription medications (regardless of type of meds)and performing surgical procedures (no matter how minor) clearly establishes that these are two entirely different schools of naturopathic thought. Traditional naturopaths use none of these procedures -- regardless of degree (ref: Coalition for Natural Health -- http://www.naturalhealth.org/tradnaturo/ppn.html#what). Granted, such procedures might be included in the federal definition of naturopathic doctor; however, this is not the definition of a traditional naturopath. Again, I stress that I am not saying one \"camp\" is better than the other. We are just different -- much as there are fundamental differences between all of the healing professions be they Medical Doctors, Osteopaths, Chiropractors, or whatever. Just because there are differences does not mean that one branch is superior to the other or that one branch should be allowed to practice to the exclusion of all others. Come on ... the world is a big place. There are plenty of folks who need access to the full scope of traditional and natural health options. At different times the same patient/client might access a range of healthcare and health maintenance options.

There is nothing inherently bad or dangerous about CNME or ANMA trained naturopaths -- there are only good and bad individual practioners from each school of thought.

Peace ... Live Well Naturally

Bill